Citizen Voices united
in protection of
the fraser river
This section of the web site is currently being updated. For more information, and media links, please visit our Facebook page here:
In the News
Published in the Vancouver Sun newspaper January 27, 2017. Former premier Harcourt joins former premier Van Der Zam in opposition to Massey bridge.
The plan to replace the Massey Tunnel with a new bridge is an unsustainable, not to mention expensive, idea. The estimated $3.5-billion cost is probably closer to $4.7 billion when all the bills come in.
According to an Oxford University study, bridges internationally over the last 50 years have averaged a 35-per-cent cost overrun. Look at our recent massive cost overruns and ongoing subsidies for the Port Mann Bridge.
Fortunately, there is s $1.7-billion dual Massey Tunnel alternative. Not only is it at least half the cost, there are other advantages:
• continuous use of existing tunnel, and the option to keep it open;
• less intrusion on precious agricultural lands;
• less impact on critical migratory bird habitat;
• more compatible with other modes of travel, like transit, pedestrian and bikes;
• less seismic vulnerability;
• faster to design and build;
• better year-round travel, (fewer winter issues); and
• less impact on the south arm of the Fraser River, and no dredging or scouring that would negatively impact the greatest salmon habitat in the world.
If that’s not enough, the other big problem is that a stand-alone Massey toll bridge proposal would just shift the traffic congestion from that route to the toll-less Alex Fraser Bridge and the Oak Street and Knight Street toll-less bridges.
Sound like the Port Mann/Pattullo Bridge debacle all over again?
One cannot say, because no one has done a scoping study. Rather odd that someone would have suggested long ago doing a twin-tunnel and now we find ourselves with a rush decision to go for a bridge.
These are some of the reasons that all Metro Vancouver mayors, save one, oppose the present Massey replacement proposal.
But, as with the Port Mann Bridge, the province is proceeding unilaterally, without proper consultation with the mayors.
The over-arching problem with the stand-alone, unilaterally imposed Massey Bridge is that it is not part of a longer-term vision and transportation plan for Metro Vancouver. We have 2.5 million people now, with two million more expected in Metro Vancouver over the next 50 years. How does the Massey Bridge address that challenge? Not in any coherent, demonstrable way.
Vancouver’s robust economy will continue to attract people. However, transportation congestion, bottlenecks, unaffordable housing, childcare, post-secondary education tuition and costs are harming our economic future.
These ad hoc, unilateral, provincially imposed transportation projects such as the Massey Bridge proposal are a bad way to address these challenges, a bad way to govern.
The Massey Tunnel alternative should be part of a 20-year bridge replacement plan, starting with the Pattullo Bridge, which should be replaced immediately.
Then we need to replace the Queensborough, Knight Street, Oak, First and Second Narrows bridges and, by the way, include transit provisions and unitary pricing for all bridges or tunnels so that we use a bridge not because it is old and free, but because it is where we need to go.
Have modest tolls on all of them, directed by provincial legislation to be used only for transportation improvements in Metro Vancouver. This way, we finally introduce the “user pay” model and reduce the current drag on the province-wide financial means.
The $4.7-billion Massey Bridge proposal should not go ahead. Instead, the $1.7-billion dual tunnel idea should be built, together with a unitary tolling system. Let’s get moving!
Michael Harcourt was B.C.’s premier from 1991 to 1996, and the mayor of Vancouver from 1980 to 1986.